Myth #1 – Good Burgundy is too expensive and over-priced.
While having a great burger at The Allison’s Jory restaurant Sunday night, I ordered a bottle of the 2006 J-J Confuron Côte de Nuits Villages les Vignottes for $48 (a very fair mark-up – this wine retails for about $38). It was surrounded on the excellent wine list by pages and pages of Oregon and California Pinots at more than double the price – many of which probably don’t deliver more than twice the pleasure, IMHO. (I’m not bagging on New World Pinot, believe me – I make it and sell it, with the intention that we deliver excellent bang for the buck in every bottle.)
Bottom line – yes, there are lots of Burgs that only billionaires, kings, and oligarchs can afford. For the rest of us, there are plenty of great values from Burgundy, if you know where to look. (And of course we’re more than happy to be your guide.)

Clos Vougeot - home to lots of mediocre Grand Cru wine
Myth #2 – Avoid the “Bad Vintages”
Many of the all-time greatest Pinot-based wines I’ve ever enjoyed have been from so-called “off” vintages. A number of Burgundy’s most revered producers – notably DRC, de Vogüé, and Mugnier among them – have often produced their finest wines in vintages that were not at all well regarded, or were in fact dismissed out of hand. In the opinion of many, these producers often routinely excel in the more difficult vintages. Closer to home, winemaker Kelley Fox and I have always thought that our 2007 Audrey and La Paulée bottlings were probably two of the best wines we’ve ever made. (Audrey sold-out as futures, so evidently somebody found something to like. The ‘07 La Paulée has not been released yet – watch for it this fall…)
Why are a number of journalists writing off en masse the 2007 Pinot Noirs in Oregon? Harvey Steiman and Matt Kramer, who both write for Wine Spectator, have each panned the vintage recently, and there have been plenty of others. On the other hand, a number of other journalists have been singing the praises of the vintage, as if in a backlash to the negative articles. I’d have to say I disagree with this group as well.
Leading Burgundy expert Allen Meadows has stated that a “vintage chart” or any kind of vintage rating for Burgundy is completely without value. I’m of the mind that this goes for New World Pinot as well. This, I have come to believe, is because Pinot Noir, not only more terroir-transparent than any other grape, is also the most producer-transparent red wine varietal – and I think when we’re talking Pinot, producer trumps “vintage” more often than not. Perhaps it’s the cool, on-the-fringe climates the grape likes, maybe it’s just the nature of the grape itself, the passionate nuts who make the wines, or a combination thereof – but I think you just can’t generalize when it comes to Pinot.
One of the wine world’s most common sayings is that “the good producers make good wine every year.” This is especially true with Pinot, it seems. Meadows has also stated that the “weather” during a given vintage is absolutely not an indication of the quality of the resulting wines. There is “weather” every vintage – but it is the sum-total of the entire growing season, plus the lingering effects of the previous year (this year’s buds are actually formed internally during the preceding year), and what the vigneron does with it that ultimately determine the outcome. Just as a great terroir does not automatically a great wine make (just look at the large lake of mediocre-at-best Grand Cru Burgundy made every year – “good” or “bad” vintages regardless) – favourable or adverse weather conditions at harvest do not dictate the quality of the final product either. There is simply so much more to it than that.
I guess the bottom line is that I wish the writers would stick to simply reviewing the wines. Fanning the flames for a “good” vintage or pissing on a “bad” one does no one a service, least of all the producers who succeeded in the “bad” ones. Will the reviewers find more wines to like and recommend in some vintages over others? Absolutely – that’s the beauty of the mysterious combination of nature and alchemy that we work with every day of our winegrowing lives. Many of our neighbours did some of their best work in 2007, and at the end of the day it’s a shame to see that excellent work cast aside like so much stale bread. Taste for yourself and decide. As always, your mileage may vary…